Foxflash programmer’s new feedback:
It is a dcm3.7 vw ecu, the customer had modifications done by a friend and he
thought it was lighter.
After opening the ecu I found that Inductor to jump
on the lines CAN H / CAN L.
Reading diagnostic suitcase with godiag.
Foxflash read ID via OBD with godiag ECU GPT adapter.
Read and write int
flash in JTAG mode.
Connection godiag no communication. Opening of the ecu test on several condo red ok black ok test line bus can from pin 67 68 towards the selfs in common mode ok after the selfs signal break 120ohm disturbed.
The OBDStar DC706 ecu tuning tool recently added a new feature that has sparked excitement among automotive enthusiasts and tuners: an ECU Unlock tab for the Chrysler GPEC2A ECM. This update suggests a streamlined way to unlock ECUs for tuning, potentially eliminating the need for manual hex editing or file transfers. But does it actually work with popular tuning software like HP Tuners? Let’s dive into the findings.
Traditionally, unlocking a GPEC2A ECU for tuning involved cumbersome steps:
The new "Unlock ECU" tab in the OBDStar DC706 software hints at a simplified process. The hope was that this feature would allow users to bypass manual modifications, making it easier to prepare the ECU for tuning with third-party software like HP Tuners.
To verify its effectiveness, a user conducted a series of tests:
1.Initial Attempt:
2.Second Attempt (Boot Mode):
Manual Unlock Success:
The exact reason remains unclear, but possible explanations include:
While the OBDStar DC706’s "Unlock ECU" feature is a welcome addition, it currently does not appear to work seamlessly with HP Tuners. For now, tuners may still need to rely on traditional manual unlocking methods.
However, this update suggests that OBDStar is moving toward simplifying ECU tuning, and future software revisions could improve compatibility. For those eager to test it, staying updated on official releases and user feedback will be key.
This article explores the key differences between the Hextag II and Xhorse Multi-Prog, providing insights to help automotive technicians, and programmers choose the right tool for their requirements.
Overview of Hextag II
The Hextag II is a professional-grade automotive programming tool known for its versatility and advanced capabilities. It is widely used for ECU cloning, chip tuning, and immobilizer programming, particularly for European vehicles like BMW, Audi, and Volkswagen. The Hextag II is recognized for its robust software, extensive vehicle coverage, and ability to handle complex tasks such as mileage correction and module repairs (e.g., BMW FRM). It is often marketed as a premium solution, with a focus on reliability and precision.
Overview of Xhorse Multi-Prog
The Xhorse Multi-Prog is the second-generation programmer from Xhorse, succeeding the VVDI Prog. It is designed for reading, writing, and cloning ECUs and TCUs, as well as handling immobilizer modules, EEPROMs, and dashboards. The Multi-Prog integrates seamlessly with other Xhorse tools like the VVDI2 and Key Tool Plus, offering a user-friendly interface, high-speed USB communication, and advanced features like batch programming and checksum correction. It is positioned as a cost-effective yet powerful tool for modern vehicles.
1. Functionality and Features
Comparison: The Hextag II is more focused on specialized, high-precision tasks with automated workflows, while the Multi-Prog offers broader functionality, including TCU cloning and batch programming, making it suitable for diverse programming needs.
2. Vehicle and ECU Compatibility
Comparison: Both tools cover a wide range of vehicles, but the Hextag II is more tailored to European brands with deeper protocol support, while the Multi-Prog offers broader global compatibility, including Asian and American vehicles, and excels in TCU programming.
3. Ease of Use and User Experience
Comparison: The Hextag II offers a more polished, automated experience for specific tasks, while the Multi-Prog prioritizes flexibility and ease of integration, appealing to users who work with multiple Xhorse tools.
4. Licensing and Cost
Comparison: The Multi-Prog is a cost-effective option with more inclusive features out of the box, while the Hextag II’s higher price is justified by its premium build and specialized functions.
5. Updates and Support
Comparison: The Multi-Prog has a slight edge in update frequency and community support, while the Hextag II offers more targeted updates for specific high-end applications.
6. Cloning and Advanced Programming
Comparison: Both tools are strong in cloning, but the Hextag II has an advantage in handling complex Bosch ECUs, while the Multi-Prog offers broader TCU cloning and script-based automation.
Which Tool Should You Choose?
Choose Hextag II if:
Choose Xhorse Multi-Prog if:
Conclusion
The Hextag II and Xhorse Multi-Prog are both powerful tools in automotive programming, but they cater to different priorities. The Hextag II is a premium, specialized solution for European vehicles, offering automated workflows and robust ECU cloning capabilities. In contrast, the Xhorse Multi-Prog is a versatile, budget-friendly option with broader compatibility, TCU support, and seamless integration with Xhorse’s ecosystem. By understanding your specific needs — whether it’s precision, cost, or vehicle coverage — you can select the tool that best enhances your workflow.
The Launch X-prog3 is on the same level as the autel xp400 pro where it is more limited? in which the Autel is more powerful?
Here is the clue.
Comparison Table
Pros and Cons
Launch X-Prog3
Pros:
Cons:
Autel XP400 Pro
Pros:
Cons:
Final Recommendation
The Autel XP400 Pro is generally the better choice for most users due to its versatility, standalone functionality, and slightly lower price. It excels in chip programming and immobilizer tasks, making it ideal for locksmiths and general diagnostic shops. However, if your focus is ECU/TCU cloning, the Launch X-Prog3 is the superior tool, especially when paired with a Launch tablet.
If you’re starting fresh and don’t own either brand’s tablet, consider your primary vehicle types and whether you need standalone capabilities. For a balanced approach, the Autel XP400 Pro paired with an IM508 or IM608 offers excellent value and flexibility.
X-Prog3 has more ECU functions and you can add an
adaptor and run it via PC.
XP400Pro can do more IMMO functions and if you can
still find it online there is the Auro PC Utility for it as well.
It is a Toyota Aygo Bosch ECU ME7.9.52.
First try full system read with foxflash, but it was not possible with this ECU,
got an error that reading was not possible.
So try boot mode.
ME7.9.52
boot mode
Decat.
Read and Write ok.
Checksum all by
foxflash.
Also did a Citroen C1 2010 ME7.9.52 ECU with foxflash software in Boot mode.
Citroën C1 /
Peugeot 107 / Toyota aygo use the same ECU type.